@Blaison Samuel No, but a simple Google search reveals someone who has bought a ton of domains, all with the keywords "J T Foxx complaints and J T Foxx lawsuits" ......possibly an attempt to bury any criticism of the fact that there was a lawsuit alleging sexual harassment of a minor, or comlpaints of him charging up to $60,000 for whatever it is he does.http://www.bizjournals.com/prnewswire/press_releases/2012/08/24/LA62361Does that help?

If they can't or won't meet that test (for any alleged reason), then no point in doing business. 

The 4th asset was allegedly still being sold and was supposed to close by the end of the week at which point he would wire me the money.

Allegedly all the lenders on the CiX site have been vetted and are legitimate.

@Cameron Daste What is more important, how much you spend over the next 30 years or how much that expense makes you?

I highly recommend Morgan and Cameron Reed.

I was referred to Fund & Grow by a podcast hosted by Clayton Morris.I started following up after three months of non-performance on the part of Clayton, Morris Invest and any and all of his agents and contacts...including a personal phone call by my son to Clayton's personal residence when he spoke personally with Natali Morris with a personal assurance that she would have Clayton contact me with information about an "ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT" that I expected from him because he allegedly was only the SALES AGENT..which would, at least, give me an additional avenue of pursuit for performance of duty.Never got word back from them beyond that on the requested Assignment of Contract.2.

The best evidence is a video recording of the alleged conduct.The "problem tenant" allegedly "telling them what to do" doesn't appear to be behavior you can prohibit, unless it rises to the level of disturbing the peace in violation of state or local law.

You choose to troll.I wish you the best - but you really need to seek other threads to spew hate and baseless allegations -- please -- there are other options for you to Karen out. 

This is because the information in the agreement will later legally become public knowledge and that means that the non-disclosure obligation is no longer in force.On the other hand, an NDA about a project subcontracted to a contractor may have an indefinite validity timeline if the company does not wish to disclose that it collaborated with a contractor on the project.In Texas, an action claiming relief for breach of an NDA or misappropriation of trade secrets must be brought within three years from the date of the alleged misappropriation or breach.When information should be returned or destroyed under an NDANDAs are usually made to support the disclosure of information for another contract.