1) We want the court responses going to the attorney, not us.2) We use eviction-focused attorneys that have scales of efficiency & price accordingly, so we really wouldn't save the owner much anyways.Have tried to share the "other side's perspective" with you, but you seem stuck on proving you're a victim.WIsh you the best of luck.

If your tenant has a history of failed payments, we permanently move to 3 day holds to ensure the funds are available.

That isn't really efficient from a management sense.

The RE market is a semi efficient market.  

So you’ll want to ensure your cash flow can cover the additional monthly note (assuming you still have a loan on them from the pre/during-Covid acquisition dates.)

However, navigating the legal and financial complexities of Subto deals requires careful attention, so I’d recommend working with a real estate attorney to ensure everything is structured correctly.Securing private money for the closing is a smart move, but ensure your terms allow for flexibility in case of unexpected repairs or delays in cash flow.

Here is some additional information to ensure success:First, tenant screening is critical, focus on creditworthiness, rental history, and stable income.

The 20% down payment isn’t a concern for me; my primary focus is ensuring the investment generates positive cash flow, which is what my post was aimed it.

I help engage brokers to find new locations, complete due diligence on prospective locations, and collaborate with landlords to ensure we are on-time with our contractual obligations. 

Specifically around efficiency in devices when not maintained and challenges with realizing potential earnings with device electrification upgrades.