I was talking about the hard money lender requirement that you have some skin in the game.

My question is, would it be unlikely for a cash investor to consider my Skills/time/labor to be skin in the deal? 

They want to see you got some skin in the game per-say.

I was thinking if I used my own money it would show I had "skin" in the game but most of the national groups have already said they are not interested.  

@Jason Allen Your description does lead me to believe this was a mild irritant situation at best.

Now, you at least have something to point to in terms of experience when the HML folks ask you for it for the run down shack you want to flip.The alternative is that if your down payment is big enough relative to purchase price (not ARV), there's always someone out there that'll finance it because your substantive skin in the game (way more than 20%) means the HML is in a "can't lose" position.

:PMake sure their 'skin in the game' (eg, down payment) is enough that you're in a "can't lose" position even if you have to foreclose. 

I propose taking his offer and making the following changes: •90/10 investment (he pays 90, you pay 10) -so you have some skin in the game.

You could also find people that do have the money and would be willing to put their money down but then you run into the problem where you can't put any of your own skin in the game and are a new investor as well.

The last message I felt almost racial abused since he is questioning us based on our skin color???