I think that anyone who claims to know what's going to happen 21 months from now, let alone 21 years from now, is click bait media at it's worst.If the coasts continue surging in price and passing nutty rent control laws, those will probably be some of the worst places to invest for anyone who doesn't have billions of $$$ lying around and an army of lawyers to keep ahead of all the red tape and regulations.Another thing is the leading nature of statistics: raw population growth does not always correlate to rising demand for houses to the extent that it will push up prices and rents.  

I've recently been gifted a plot of land back in my hometown (East Preston, Nova Scotia, Canada if any of you are familiar). It's in what I think is a good location, but it's rural and still has an overgrowth of trees...

@Ryan Weimer - entitling raw land and developing (especially MF, SF, or Industrial) is our current focus and Boise is high on our list. 

One day of flying in, met with a realtor and look at some houses or raw land, for one day.

Remember to include the demo costs if you are expecting a flipper to demo the house, or consider doing the demo yourself to have a piece of raw land to sell.good luck!

I have real estate development experience through various projects that I have taken from raw land to final site plan approval.

It seems like raw land not a fix and flip, I wouldn't buy anything until you have access.

@Mario Am,The raw data is from the American Community Survey (Annual Census) The visualization is generated via a project that I am currently working on 

I have just started a raw land business.

A single family can be exchanged for a multi, office building, warehouse, raw land, even mineral rights.