If it isn't a safety issue schedule it at your convenience (also if you don't pay heat.)Put your location in your profile and you may get more location specific advice. 

They want us living paycheck-to-paycheck so we will rely on government for our safety nets like healthcare, retirement, and soon they will add housing.

It'd be worse from a dollar amount standpoint, but better from an ROI standpoint, which seems like the bigger picture to me.A total project cost of $101k and an ARV of $110k seems like a slim margin of safety, unless you're planning on holding for 3-4 years. 

Been there done that.Our town decided that all multi's required a fire safety audit & the Fire Sprinkler System we were required to instal eliminated the need for many expensive tedious upgrades to 'suppress' a raging fire.

Safety should be your first choice.

This is could be a marketing opportunity for multfamily investors to highlight their hygiene and safety considerations maybe by adding sanitizer, sanitzing wipes and other measures to common areas as hygiene amenities... just a thought. 

I would even say this is for her protection, if people are breaking the windows, you want to ensure her safety as a tenant in your property. 

Generally, I find that's the middle-class group here, never had to work in food service as teenagers, never learned about food safety.

A minimum of 51% of the entire building square footage is for residential use and the commercial use will not effect the health and safety of the occupants of the residential property. 

A landlord can limit the number of occupants for health and safety or legitimate business reasons.