Quote from @Richard Elvin: @Mike Dymski There's a thread about that issue also: https://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/25/topics/1145696-pleas...There was no resolution to that thread. 

I believe that finding a mutually beneficial resolution would be in the best interest of both parties involved.Please understand that a legal eviction process entails involving the authorities, which may result in your forced removal from the apartment by the police, along with the removal of your belongings.

You take into consideration things you do not think of here abroad such as title insurance, regulations, dispute resolution, financial transparency.Investing overseas should not be taken lightly and is typically only done by large REITS, pension funds because they have boots on the ground in those areas to deal with complexities involved. 

The property manager stated the reason for the Stop Order was because with no resolution, the dispute could be headed to court and the losing party would have to cover court costs for the prevailing party.Was the property manager within their rights to place a Stop Order on this check?

So I would talk with all three parties about the dilemma and ask all three parties what they think would be a fair resolution.

I have a resolution I don't want to use but I will have to bank myself and get out of this hole so I can achieve balance and attempt to scale. 

It was a foreclosure, owned by the Resolution Trust Corporation.

I don't think it is so much the camera as the resolution being good for your situation.

Lets see if we cant get you to a resolution.  

You want a mutually acceptable resolution to your situation that, if possible, doesn't involve a third party.