I am certain there are other provisions that describe performance, liability, negligence, and other things.

Let's talk about gross negligence:Gross negligence is a lack of care that demonstrates reckless disregard for the safety or lives of others. 

A friend of mine has a property manager that has claimed to fix issues with their rental property and has shown some signs of negligence. 

Financing the difference in price @ todays rates (for myself) would be negligible.

@Geovany Espinoza the difference between strong coverage and minimum coverage will be negligible over a year.

(The post office can also tell you if the second box should be labeled "Unit 2", or "Suite 1/2", instead.)No matter the location of the box, the expense to mount said box would be a negligible one-time cost.

For example: if one of the owners wants to sell and there's a negligent and uncooperative owner, it would be unlikely that they would be able to pass papers.

As long as there is no gross negligence- yes.

Technically, it does not appear I have an obligation to cover the deductible as there was no negligence on my part. 

I'm not sure if you as a property owner would be found negligent in court if you contracted with a legal company and one of their employees was injured at your property and the company you hired did not have worker's compensation insurance.