@Anthoney Hanks that is a very thought-provoking suggestion.

Fellow BP Colleagues,Requesting your thought provoking guidance on the following hypothetical situation in California:The tenancy is month to month and per the signed agreement, the tenant must deposit monthly rent in the Landlord's bank account.Tenant did not deposit the monthly rent and the landlord starts the eviction process.Tenant decides to deposit partial rent into Landlord's bank account and tries to circumvent the eviction.What I have read, once the Landlord accepts the partial rent, the eviction process cannot move forward.How does one define "acceptance" of partial direct deposit to Landlord's bank account when Landlord does not want to accept the partial payment and wants to proceed with eviction?

Businesses, real estate, and options strategies and cashflowing investments are better than a JOB.I don't agree with everything Kyosaki says or does, but I believe  he is contributing to society by provoking thought and challenging misconceptions.  

Andy asks a lot of thought provoking questions, many of which I had never been asked before and I did my best to give him content filled, relevant answers.There's no other promotion or anything for sale.

.#2 Create fake profiles and comment on my post making sure to overuse the words "witty, insightful and thought provoking".#3 Try again in 30 days with a better headline.#4 Delete the post and pretend it never happened.Mehran K.

It is however, a question to provoke thought, not one with a definitive answer.

It is thought provoking. 

Hi Jon,Those are provoking questions. 

If you comment with a question or two, you'll probably get a response as well, :).The podcasts are great as well- informative, thought provoking, inspiring, motivating, and very comical sums them up.

. , your title is bold and thought provoking and I agree with you.