I'm not sure what is in your "CYA" disclosure, if it is from guru I'd run that by your attorney as well, they are not all compliant nor sufficient.If the seller has addressed all disclosures required and you have basically told the seller of the pitfalls of a sub-2 transaction, you may be ready to clsoe.......ask the settlement agent.Evidence of good title in ten days is pretty standard stuff as after you contract for the purchase, you have time for a title search and if there are problems you have the opportunity to accept the defects (if they can not be cured) or to continue to purchase.

I sold because of the inflation and I was stretched out thin with tenants calling every minute about a small defect.

Account Closed every building has its defects, and there is no reason to get particularly worried here IMHO...

I would think that a realtor is incentivized to choose inspectors who are less likely to reveal home defects, if their interest is in the commission.

If we fall out of escrow due to discovered defects during inspection, that's another $4000 gone.

The insurance companies know that the policies are usually being put in place because there’s often defects with the property - such as the roof in your case.  

This specifically is an Intentionally Defective Grantor Trust.

I don’t understand when there are crappy crappy photos of a unit or obvious “defects” that could be fixed cheaply and are holding people back from renting.

Somebody wanting to sue for you backing out of a bad deal or accusing you of selling them a property with defects like unknown termite damage).

I'm most concerned about some contractual issue coming up, i.e. the title company signs the closing documents despite a title defect.