Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/hospitable-deef083b895516ce26951b0ca48cf8f170861d742d4a4cb6cf5d19396b5eaac6.png)
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_trust-2bcce80d03411a9e99a3cbcf4201c034562e18a3fc6eecd3fd22ecd5350c3aa5.avif)
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_1031_exchange-96bbcda3f8ad2d724c0ac759709c7e295979badd52e428240d6eaad5c8eff385.avif)
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated about 2 years ago on . Most recent reply
![Aria Drexler's profile image](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/995800/1621507073-avatar-ariad1.jpg?twic=v1/output=image/crop=820x820@59x14/cover=128x128&v=2)
Irrevocable trust and asset control?
I will try to keep this concise - I own a duplex in North Carolina outright that is currently in an LLC and got married about a year ago. My husband has been having legal issues due to a vindictive ex, and may need to default on a business note that she took over (railroaded) as part of divorce settlement, for which he is also personally liable and would likely be sued for. I have concerns that she would then try to come after my assets if he files for personal bankruptcy. We do not have any joint accounts and he has no association with the LLC, but I still don't trust she couldn't come after me.
My concern is that since he and I do not own a primary residence, which an LLC is designed to protect, the duplex as my main asset and source of monthly income would be at risk. I have read that an irrevocable trust would protect everything placed into it, but that I would not be able to access the income or other assets. Where I am confused is that my father had 3 properties in an irrevocable trust (in California) and lived on the income and managed his assets as both the grantor and trustee until he passed. I am not sure if this would have voided any protections from creditors he could have had, or if this was allowed in California law, but he did it for years.
I know this is not a legal forum, but I can't find an estate attorney who will take me as a client or answer the question of whether acting as both grantor and trustee can get you around that limitation on a Wyoming trust. The asset protection people I have talked to advised me either to divorce or do an offshore LLC, neither of which I am willing to do. If I designated another trustee to manage the trust, is there a way they could pass the income through? Any tips or referrals appreciated.
Most Popular Reply
![Richard Bechtol's profile image](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2518913/1664198954-avatar-richardb631.jpg?twic=v1/output=image/crop=3456x3456@615x0/cover=128x128&v=2)
I will say that what people think of as irrevocable trusts can vary all over the place. I have experience in Ohio working with a certain type of irrevocable trust used in planning for Long term Care. This specifically is an Intentionally Defective Grantor Trust. I wanted to give that caveat because there are many types of irrevocable trusts so I am just speaking from one particular kind.
The important role with a trust for creditor protection is going to be the beneficiary role. When a creditor pursues a trust that someone is involved in they are pursuing their role as a beneficiary because that is the only individual entitled to the assets of said trust. This basically means regardless of who plays the role of trustee and grantor in a trust the role of beneficiary is the crucial position because that is who the assets are used for the benefit of.
With the type of trust I use in Ohio the way we protect the assets is by having the lifetime beneficiary be someone other than the grantor. Typically they use children and pass the money through the children's name. The children can use it for anything they want so the parent can still end up with the money in the end. This may have been the type of setup your father had because he could still be the trustee and manage the assets himself.
This type of trust would likely protect you, depending on local laws, in your situation because the asset that is place in the trust would no longer be considered yours to a creditor. I hope this helps!