One of the reasons that people enter into LLCs is to limit their exposure, downside, etc.

We are increasing our exposure in AZ flips, looking for higher end properties with large spreads ($100k+) and mixing in simple flips under $250k.

Property management companies and exclusive brokers who have listings in these buildings are typically eager to get more exposure for their unsold units.

Hi Everyone - I wanted to get some opinions on the best way to increase deal exposure?

Unless you have $100,000 or so in equity, your liability exposure is very small.

Which means we have an exposure to the rate of rent, right? 

Although, I have had exposure to RE in four distinct ways: from a regulatory perspective during my time with the FDIC, from an underwriting perspective as part of a CRE underwriting team at BofA, from a public markets persepctive in my current role as an investment analyst, and as a homeowner for the past seven years.  

That may be a great way to get some exposure and pass along the knowledge to that population. 

So, you will either have get more expensive money (commercial loan or hard money) and have the property in an LLC, or get the cheaper money but risk exposure by having the property in your name.I'm not willing to risk my other assets (including my personal home) by having a property in my name.

And that's still after pulling out 25k last year.I'm saying that because as I become reacquainted with the site and read of $100 - $200 cash flows per month that seems terribly low for the risk and exposure in this game.10 years ago I listened in awe as people spoke of their 10 or 15 "rental properties."