![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/29113/small_1621364699-avatar-bobwalt14.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
30 January 2013 | 2 replies
I like these because it appears that the discount I get over properties in A areas is very large in proportion to the negatives of owning in these areas.
26 September 2013 | 11 replies
Also, depending on budget/investment and ARV, maybe build a large cedar deck out front, possibly the same width as the dormer, with large pergola beams jutting out from the house, to create a false roof, seating area out front, and to add size to the front of the structure to TRY to bring some proportion back to the visual aspect of main level vs. dormer.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/246214/small_1621435939-avatar-saarkagan.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
3 June 2016 | 20 replies
Short sale flipping reached such proportions that the government and the industry both put measures in place to rein it in, title seasoning not being the least of them.2.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/171503/small_1621421296-avatar-srv3.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
4 March 2016 | 10 replies
They have argued that different groups allocate a greater proportion of their income to accommodation costs.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/691738/small_1621495547-avatar-bobb101.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
26 January 2017 | 10 replies
Does this mean that any profits from the sale of the real estate could technically be split and returned to each funding source in direct proportion to its original investment?
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/208760/small_1621433326-avatar-bboone2787.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
25 May 2015 | 6 replies
Any additional expense would typically result in a proportional increase in the price at the every least unless you already substantially overpriced the property at $199K.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/487560/small_1621478893-avatar-jasonl62.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
3 January 2017 | 6 replies
Mobilization will be a bigger proportion for a small lot.3.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/674653/small_1694573592-avatar-tarcizio.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
21 January 2017 | 8 replies
It's (variations of):-"On average, ROUGHLY 50% of your rental income will be spent on expenses".Yes, properties that generate 2%+/m gross rental return are more likely to average HIGHER than 50% expenses (because risk / cap ex will be a higher PROPORTION of low purchase price).Conversely, properties that generate less than 1.25%/m gross rental return are more likely to average LESS than 50% expenses (ie. higher initial purchase price, but same cap ex $).
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/221198/small_1621434214-avatar-pavelpvrv.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
17 October 2016 | 9 replies
Still, economic growth lagged real estate activity since affordable housing was still difficult to come by for some Louisville natives.Renting is a Hot OptionWith there being lots of multi-family units sold in the Louisville area, it stands to reason that a large proportion of residents are actually renters and not owners.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/686035/small_1621495445-avatar-johnc385.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
29 December 2016 | 20 replies
@John Cook The expenses should be proportion to rents.