Indeed, I don't want to get into an argument with Henry Clark mainly because he invests there and I don't but also because I don't like being negative, wasting energy on arguing and I highly respect and appreciate Henry and his many contributions to this very forum.

It's not just some money sitting around it was hard earned with their time and energy or it could be family legacy money that was passed down to them which is just as important.Right now investors can get about 5% just sitting liquid in the bank but taxed at the highest rate.

I find the old school "snap traps" are the cheapest and most efficient.

The concept seems better than new construction in terms of project time, but I'm wondering about the cons to this idea with exception of price being an obvious one.In theory it seems scalable and efficient, in my mind acquiring the land suitable would be the hardest task.

A Trump win would loosen up energy policy which might mean cheaper fuel to ship goods which will trickle down to lower prices for goods, but he didn't curb spending as much as you might think.

I have found that locally, this is where you can see other homeowners who needed the same thing done and often times they have someone who isn't big on the internet or on a list, but is reliable and cost-efficient and they appreciate the business.

I like hi energy.

The next steps in paper work were pretty quick and efficient.

Minimize your taxes, because lending outside of a retirement plan is not at all tax-efficient.

Now they’ve spent those 40 years saying it’s 90% cheaper and 90% more efficient and yet the break even is still 10-15 years.