The absence of a commentary for a particular fact pattern or scenario should not be interpreted to mean that the Canon does not apply.

There will be more data drive AI collecting data and putting in formats but humans still using it and interpreting it to make final decisions.

Many homes are overprice but even at tax assessment value, the rental income is not meeting the 2% rule.Am I mis-interpreting this rule?

While I do not work in this area, I was able to an answer for you concerning the legality of short-term rentals:"Atlanta's statute is largely silent on the matter, but we spoke by phone with zoning and other city officials and were told that they interpret current law such that short-term rentals are prohibited.

If there is damage to the rental, we will treat your deposit according to state law and your lease.If you choose to reject this offer and decide to stay, we will interpret this as an acceptance of the rental's current condition.

There is also significant grey area, subject to interpretation.

Only someone who needs attention and validation would interpret me going over my background (as a response to saying I was not an attorney) as comparing wholesaling to sex crimes.Keep the forum on track.

As shocked as I am to find this law; I'm also not confident to interpret it to my liking.

HMM never heard of that regarding criminals  https://calcivilrights.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/32/20...Using CA as an example:- not allowed to place a blanket ban based on criminal record- are not allowed to access certain forms of criminal records (arrests, post-trial diversions, sealed expunged records)- you are technically allowed to access conviction data and use it, but your interpretation of that data must comport perfectly with how CA wants you to interpret it (must have direct bearing, must have been recent enough etc)- even if you follow all of this perfectly, accessing the criminal records must not "have a discriminatory effect" so if certain special people are impacted you are still looking at liability.As a result of this legal minefield many just decide to forget looking at criminal or to find some other criteria.

I think I need to clarify or add more detail to my statements so they're not mis-interpreted or misunderstood.