In case anyone is interested, my lawyer is in the process of taking my case to the Supreme Court.

It’s over Supreme Court blocked it so you should be able to get an eviction and writ  https://www.supremecourt.gov/o...In Wayne township the judge would set compliance hearings but would never rule - kept giving tenant another chance.  

., (1964) 42 TC 1067.The Supreme Court has explained that the distinction between co-owners of property and partners depends on whether they intend to and, in fact, join together for the present conduct of an undertaking or enterprise-The following factors are often cited as evidence of this intent:The agreement of the parties and their conduct in executing its terms;The contributions, if any, that each party makes to the venture;Control over income and capital and the right of each party to make withdrawals;Whether the parties are co-proprietors who share in net profits and have an obligation to share losses;Whether business was conducted in the joint names of the parties;Whether the parties held themselves out as joint venturers; andWhether separate books of account were maintained for the venture.The court held that the co-ownership arrangement constituted a partnership for federal tax purposes.

This is how the Supreme Court has ruled in the past. 

The second requires landlords to pay certain tenants relocation assistance if the landlord raises the rent by 10% or more and the tenant moves out.Mayor Durkan Announces January 15, 2022 Extension of Eviction Moratorium and Continuation of Additional COVID-Related ProtectionsOn Thursday, the Washington State Supreme Court ruled in favor of a Seattle law that requires landlords to rent on a first-come, first-served basis.

The issue was litigated to our Supreme Court who agreed with the insurance company.

We worked with David from Supreme Lending and a title company.

In the American context, I could point to both the Fed and the Supreme Court.

In some midwestern states, Supreme Court justices are in the opinion that the practice is unconstitutional.

Alabama Supreme Court decision "Coffee County Abstract & Title Co v.