Maybe suggest she talk to cpa she trust, so she can get a neutral 3rd party opinion.But no, it is not standard or expected that the seller automatically pays the buyer’s closing cost.

Glad to hear you already own two properties in our market, that's amazing.You definitely won't find 1% or 2% rule properties out here but there are cashflow neutral or slight negative options out towards the valley (Chilliwack/mission/abbotsford).1.

Pooling water starts with negative or neutral grading issues.

It's very expensive and nice wood, but should probably be painted.I think if you went more neutral you'd have more mass appeal. 

The seller initially felt the building was worth more than we wanted to pay, which I find is typical with FSBO situations, so the agent was critical in the initial negotiation by providing accurate comps and bringing the seller down to earth from a neutral third party standpoint, saving us $$$ on top of covering their commission.

I will add that real estate prices are somewhat inflated in Anchorage and its hard to find a 4 Plex on the market that can realistically even have neutral cash flow.

It has a new roof, doors, lighting, bathroom tile and fixtures, hardwood flooring, and neutral paint throughout.

This home features a wood burning fireplace on the first floor, first floor master bedroom, new wood flooring, granite counter tops, new kitchen cabinets, new bathroom tile and fixtures, new drywall throughout, new lighting, ceiling fans, new windows, neutral paint throughout and a built in island range with hood and upgraded s What made you interested in investing in this type of deal?

That, plus managing it yourself, and hoping the property is new build or at least significantly renovated already, could change the numbers to at least cash-neutral.

Delaware was a "neutral" enough jurisdiction for everyone involved.