The return on leveraged multifamily is higher and looks prettier on paper but there are pros and cons to both.I would put the math on the back burner for a minute and look at what your goals are.My goal was to have 50k net cash flow without being overleveraged(75%+).

One of the carry-over tenants was not paying rent, so we learned real fats how to deal with eviction process, small claims, changing locks, etc.

Even if the burner control module is acting up they’re all serviceable.

My answer would be a big fat YES!

I put the project on the back-burner due to not knowing how to get started / who to reach out to help. 

I've heard a saying in my real estate learning, "Pigs get fat, hogs get slaughtered".

Sure, they're cash flowing for a few years and feeling like geniuses (I did the same), but then those big expenses creep in and after 7-10 years, and the next thing they know they're staring a nice big fat rehab bill that eats up all that cash flow from the previous years. 

If it were my listing, I would be taking the advice from above and making other changes to the home and listing in addition to a fat price drop ($10k is not fat enough to get buyers excited again). 

Purchase price: $178,000 Cash invested: $170,000 Sale price: $322,500 Fix and flip, the investor got fat on this one because it was a year project and we paid him 10% APR.

It’ll take you longer to gain access to the burner to change the orifice than actually changing it out will.