I've already heard rumblings about large companies contracting their footprints in secondary and tertiary cities.

On the zoning/permitting front, I have pretty extensive experience through my engineering background and connections to environmental firms that I feel good about the property itself but will need to rely on the developer for execution here. 

As a lawyer, you should see the important distinction.It's like saying that "there are multiple performance and environmental benefits of wearing seat belts."

Additionally, this could lead to more pain for commercial buildings as Amazon has a massive office space footprint in Seattle. 

They left the place a mess with half eaten food containers all over, muddy foot prints everywhere,  paint on every new door knob, paint on every window glass, a new door that he installed wasn't even painted - just factory prime on it as if I wouldn't notice, filthy toilets and one with human waste in it.

Just keep in mind they are way more expensive than a normal house per square foot because they have all the features of a house with a much smaller footprint.

This may just be the easiest route as then the different cleaning fees and additional guest add-ons will likely be easier to set up this route.It would be only two listings, I can't separate anything outside with any expectation of privacy and I don't want to change the foot print of the exterior as it works well for my large family (I'll be using it some).  

Industrial you have to pay special attention to any environmental contamination of the site and the POTENTIAL from the type of industrial tenant as some are low risk and some are very high risk.

It seems that the tenant pool is constantly changing with the local environmental variables.

Netflix (which has its largest footprint now in Hollywood) isn't going anywhere.