
21 December 2016 | 1 reply
Personally, if they're being that unreasonable with the price, I would say walk away.

29 December 2016 | 6 replies
If he is, I don't think it is unreasonable for him/her to want to charge a fee for his/her time to see if you are an approvable borrower before you are given a letter of good funds.

28 December 2016 | 8 replies
They didnt consult us on the price increase.Now its a big ordeal negotiating down to the price we agreed upon.Id just like to make sure that we arent being unreasonable.
28 December 2016 | 8 replies
The tenants who have been in the home have been there for almost 4 years and have been as close to ideal as u could hope for(always pay on time+take care of property with zero unreasonable requests) The tug of war in my mind is do I continue to pay out of pocket (have enough reserves to continue to do so) and own the property free and clear with significant cash flow in 5-6 years OR sell.

1 January 2017 | 12 replies
But, I don't want to be unreasonable.

30 December 2016 | 7 replies
I could see them having a commission built in if the tenant buys, but 6% is totally unreasonable.

3 January 2017 | 11 replies
And it was clear then their proforma numbers left out the 20K a year loss due to paying all the utilities. on an 8 unit building in Alaska...I'm finding the task of finding and dealing with MF investments to be unreasonably time consuming not to mention frustrating and extremely risky.
11 January 2017 | 11 replies
The conventional lender provided me with a pre-approval letter, but the hard money lender stated he would only provide me with a pre-approval letter on a house by house basis, which means it would be unreasonable for him to give me one for each of the 20 offers I plan on submitting.

5 January 2017 | 6 replies
That said, I'm not unreasonable - if something truly unexpected happens through no fault of the contractor's, I might let them off the hook, but if not, I deduct from the final payment.

20 October 2016 | 24 replies
Scott (34 Cal. 2d 116,208 P. 2d 367), that California Civil Code Section 3275 was a sufficient barrier to harshand unreasonable foreclosure proceedings.