6 November 2009 | 14 replies
The case by the SEC is 09 Civ. 6829 (JSR), and googling that leads you to http://www.docstoc.com/docs/11397920/SEC-v-B-of-AWhich is the memorandum order, and it spells out the whos, whats, and whyfores, in courtspeak.But, in short, In the Complaint in this case, filed August 3, 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“S.E.C.â€) alleges, in stark terms, that defendant Bank of America Corporation materially lied to its shareholders in the proxy statement of November 3, 2008 that solicited the shareholders’ approval of the $50 billion acquisition of Merrill Lynch & Co.

29 October 2010 | 22 replies
That is why I specified to go to the proper legal authorities as even if your case is proven legit, it will still probably cost you more to defend yourself from those who feel it was not legal.

20 November 2009 | 7 replies
While many defend their favorite way of calculating alternates, cap rate traditionally includes operating expenses only; not capital expenses.

6 August 2012 | 30 replies
I don't know why I feel the need to defend Marko Rubel, but my experience with his software is quite different from yours, John Davern.
18 November 2009 | 4 replies
The most important thing to me is freedom---so I can live out my true passion and purpose of ministering to those in need.I hope to help all of you in any way I can.

30 May 2010 | 10 replies
I can't believe I'm defending the banks, but I see nothing wrong with what they're doing.This is a numbers game.

2 June 2010 | 53 replies
I'm not here to defend Free Gaza.

4 June 2010 | 3 replies
If you have a problem with family - take it to a counselor or your minister.

9 June 2010 | 8 replies
I agree with Tom that talking to the scumbag is worth trying - just be prepared to defend yourself.

8 January 2011 | 75 replies
Originally posted by Tom Cullen:Conservative believe what they see, liberals see what they believe.Mike M -See, this is a perfect example of what I meant above when I referred to people who just digress into weird and nonsensical partisan tirades when they don't have anything constructive to add...Instead of providing insight or even opinion on the topic at hand, all we get is a stupid one-liner that tries to discredit 50% of the population's input based on a meaningless (and sadly not even pithy, amusing or insightful) quote, obviously just parroted from some talking head.Surprisingly, Tom's comment didn't make some ridiculous association with Nancy Pelosi, cap and trade, gay soldiers or Nazi's, but it's only a matter of time...Tom - Thank you for helping make my point to one of the few people here who was actually trying to defend you...