Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Agent
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 14 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

32
Posts
1
Votes
Mike Hummer
  • Homeowner
  • modesto, CA
1
Votes |
32
Posts

why not be just truthful!!!

Mike Hummer
  • Homeowner
  • modesto, CA
Posted

I looked at a property that is a bank forclosure asking price $116k. I wanted to make an offer full price with financing . I was told by my agent,that" the property has muliple cash offers, the selling bank was going to look at the cash offers on only, on Monday". so I passed .
A week later the property is still listed as available. I called my agent again , she said " They ( the bank) are looking for higher offers than the asking price.
My question is , Isnt the selling agreeement a contract to sell with a Broker at a set price agreed by the seller? and if the agent brings in a ready , willing and able buyer,and the meeting of the minds have been met , therefore the agent has earned a commission?.What ever happend to Specific Performance?
It seems to me the banks are using agents to auction the properties to the highest bidder and disregard the contracted asking price, which to me is unethical .
Why hasnt the Real Estate Commissioner stepped in to stop this type of behavior?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

22,059
Posts
14,127
Votes
Jon Holdman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Mercer Island, WA
14,127
Votes |
22,059
Posts
Jon Holdman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Mercer Island, WA
ModeratorReplied

C'mon, exactly the same thing was happening five years ago. Only it was regular folks and developers selling properties for "highest and best" offers. The listing price was just a starting point for the bidding.

The listing contract is strictly between the seller and the listing agent. It says nothing more than if there is a buyer willing to pay the listing price, the agent has earned their commission. There's no obligation in that contract that obligates the seller to accept ANY contract, regardless of the terms or price. If the bank rejects all offers, and there was at least one over the listing price, the agent gets a commission, nothing more.

The banks appear to have adopted exactly the same strategy every seller was using during the boom. Exactly the same strategy any of us would use if it would work for us. But for them its unethical? I can't believe I'm defending the banks, but I see nothing wrong with what they're doing.

This is a numbers game. If you want to buy ONE SPECIFIC house, don't even try to buy a REO. You'll have nothing but pain. If you want to buy a REO, make 20 offers. That should give you a reasonable chance of buying one.

Loading replies...