
25 July 2018 | 3 replies
This indemnification agreement does not waive Owner’s Agent’s duty of care to prevent personal injury or property damage when that duty is imposed by law.Resident May End Lease Early:Resident may end this lease before the end date of the lease or any renewal term only with written permission from the owner and only if: (A) Resident gives owner minimum written notice as defined in the lease end notice procedures, AND (B) Resident pays owner a minimum Early Release Fee of two months’ rent, plus utilities during the required notice period, OR (C) Resident continues to pay all rent and utilities until the end date of the lease or, Owner secures a new resident to take the place of the current Resident, whichever occurs first.

10 July 2018 | 4 replies
For me, I only allow my partners to pass on "economic shares" (I am NOT a lawyer, I might be calling this the wrong thing), so their spouse will still get the monetary benefits of the partnership but not have any decision-making power unless I vote them into the company, it prevents me from becoming parnters by default with someone who may not know/understand/value/think/share my investment philosophy5.

13 July 2018 | 36 replies
It’ll hopefully prevent you from making serious mistakes.

30 August 2018 | 7 replies
She the judgment was actually to her advantage to prevent nasty surprises in the future.

13 July 2018 | 6 replies
I know they are trying to update the law with the choice act because the Dodd-Frank has had unintended consequences that for some reason the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau wont rectify...Former Congressman Barney Frank, who co-sponsored the legislation, said he was “regretful to realize” its negative impact not long after Dodd-Frank became the law of the land.In a 2011 letter to a constituent, Frank wrote:“I do not think it is necessary to include manufactured housing as part of our effort to prevent abusive mortgage practices, and I am now working with my staff to see if we can find a way to make a change that would deal with the problem you correctly point out… “

16 July 2018 | 11 replies
The result may have been different had the investor required the homeowner to see independent legal counsel regarding the initial transactions to prevent claims of ‘over reaching’ and ‘duress.’"

11 July 2018 | 3 replies
Does anyone have a good person to contact to try and figure out what issue is so it can be prevented?

12 July 2018 | 10 replies
Basically, you are stuck in limbo until the the case is dismissed because the automatic stay prevents you from foreclosing.I've read that some borrowers (especially the ones that are legitimately trying to pay their debts) will file a POC on behalf of creditors, which they are allowed to do.

21 August 2018 | 8 replies
Would love to learn a little more about what you're current strategy is and what's preventing you from pushing forward to the next level!

16 July 2018 | 24 replies
You could sign contracts with him that would prevent him from going around you, but then again build the relationship and there should be no reason he's not happy to pay a fee for bringing him the property.Also, keep in mind your fee doesn't have to be huge, or even proportional to the size of the project.