@William Sutterfield some cities have banned vacation rentals, and some only allow within so many streets/miles near beaches.

@Jeff B. An

I do agree that banning on futures isn’t a safe to base an analysis on. 

If they haven't completely banned them, and are designating a core area where they are allowed, it seems reasonable.When you purchase a home in a SFR neighborhood, that stands for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, etc.

The buyers had the property inspected and the inspector came back and said the pipes in the home are made from polyeurothain which is a banned material and the whole house needs to be replaced with a different material.

I have properties in Grand and Summit Counties and my company is looking to buy more as STR's even where the locals are trying to ban them.

The rules set limits on the number of days a primary home can be rented and bans, RSO (rent stabilized) units, trailers, RV's, sheds, and other structures from being used for vacation rentals.

That is why Robert Kiyosaki in I think it was Rich Dads Guide to Investing starts by talking about renaissance-age Italian and English shipping investments and how people would ban together to fund a merchant ship sailing to Asia to bring back spices and haul in a great return.

Senators and Representatives from Chicago are pushing to remove the state ban on rent control.

@Joseph Mee, the property is in Pawtucket, and the city does allow parking on one side of the street (aside from parking bans).