data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9854/e9854453a22675df810e6daaf02d1ead9b094cba" alt=""
13 April 2011 | 26 replies
That's my interpretation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71d5a/71d5ae9613141d5eddc405bef66d22d46449d593" alt=""
9 March 2011 | 72 replies
I'm only trying to make a point with all readers that using acceptable terms that are generally accepted in any industry really helps put everyone on the same page, to understand what is being expressed and not have to interpret what might be meant.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5d42/c5d42010f32b5dfae9210b98da03730b0733ff58" alt=""
29 March 2011 | 23 replies
Provided you don't suspect it being fake or assumed something big in the last 30 days happened.The notes even specifically state: " Paragraph (b) does not prohibit a landlord from obtaining a more current consumer credit check at the landlord’s expense"http://legis.wisconsin.gov/rsb/code/atcp/atcp134.pdfNevertheless, though not specifically mentioned in the statutes, but it is always interpreted that way (e.g. in training classes, maybe the earnest monoey rules play into this, etc.) you may not charge another application fee, even if you background check costs you $30, and then both employers of a couple require you to use that $@%$&**** Work Number, charging you another $15 per person, then you're out $90.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d9ca/3d9ca15d12c9a6a7dc6b2614304f8812b04142a3" alt=""
14 March 2011 | 5 replies
Price fixing is illegal so RE companies cannot charge a set industry price.As a Realtor or licensed agent you owe the seller your Fiduciary responsibility.http://www.efmoody.com/arbitration/fiduciary.html The good faith has been interpreted to impose an obligation to act reasonably in order to avoid negligent handling of the beneficiary's interests as well the duty not to favor ANYONE ELSE'S INTEREST (INCLUDING THE TRUSTEES OWN INTEREST) over that of the beneficiary.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71d5a/71d5ae9613141d5eddc405bef66d22d46449d593" alt=""
5 February 2011 | 29 replies
It is a conservative interpretation of equity and is perfectly valid for someone who does not participate in upside when investing in a project.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71d5a/71d5ae9613141d5eddc405bef66d22d46449d593" alt=""
3 February 2011 | 11 replies
I've asked for a citation as to how they interpret it that way.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68450/68450a1c6cba6c5d74fdd774b665a0d89d5c19b9" alt=""
27 January 2011 | 23 replies
Here is guidance from a few months back in Texas://Begin QuoteI talked with TDSML…here is a summary of their interpretation of compliance for owner financing as it relates to loan origination activities.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80b06/80b06329fcbeeb80851917e0d74b60720985afee" alt=""
28 January 2011 | 2 replies
We need a title company (or two) in the Greenville, SC area that is of the philosophy that they will not interpret this short sale approval letter as requiring that a deed restriction be placed on the property stating it can't transfer for 30 days.Any recommendations?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2e5d/a2e5d5bc95c66f287fec7bf61a31db9a706930cc" alt=""
14 September 2020 | 9 replies
Hey Kenneth,Great job on finding a good cashflow property, even if it is in a less than desirable area.Im confused with how you're interpretating ARV.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04318/04318f8f6e36469361e5fa1b8879f4110b5baa0d" alt=""
9 February 2011 | 82 replies
Among the ones that do have licensing for home inspectors, there are very few cases that interpret the licensing requirements or discuss the unauthorized practice of home inspection.