You’re going to have a legal local lease made up, research the local laws, make sure you don’t even appear to discriminate, figure how/where to advertise, do background checks and so on.

I tell everybody I wish I had known about all the benefits and flexibility years ago when I started real estate investing.I'm not entirely clear on your post if that's what you were asking about but that's what it appears like to me.Happy to help answer any questions you might have!

Make friends, it doesn't hurt.Then on to what Jason had to say.To those I didn't know, which was not often, I would remain very reserved, as Jason says, but being careful not to appear as though I was attempting to "influence" any outcome, that can be very touchy now.

Until a new "Robinhood" appeared (it could be zillow or homes.com), there would be not much earthquake.

The project in THIS THREAD appears to be one of Kent Ritter's projects.

The property is unique in that it is two separate buildings that both appear residential.

However, the communication from the corporate office appears to be directly from the owner, Michael, who has proactively engaged with me and my associates through a call to address our questions and concerns.

One of the tenants appears mentally ill and another has anger issues.   

(which appears to be what question you're actually wanting answered)*Insert generic "I'm not a lawyer, consult your own professionals" statement here*First, I have all tenants fill out a worksheet that indicates what type of animal it is, including generic information about the dog such as name, age, breed, and who does the dog assist (if not readily apparent and there will be multiple people residing in the house.)

A different and, for some purposes, a better statement of the conclusion is that parties will tend to want damages to be the remedy when the reason for breach is high cost (as could only be true for a contract to produce) and would tend to prefer specific performance to be the remedy when the reason for breach is sale to an outside party (as could be true either for a contract to produce or for a contract to convey).Consequently, it appears this piece, while admittedly interesting, has nothing to do with what we are discussing.I have not seen anything to date that indicates that a court would do anything other than order specific performance if the buyer has met his burden never mind considering whether the buyer intends to be an occupant of flip it.Based on the work product produced so far, I doubt I will be retaining you anytime soon.P.S.