I've seen many people advise investors to get the deed, when doing a short sale, and then get a POA from the seller - that would describe this 'The tactics, he said, allegedly included manipulating the homeowners to sign over ownership and control of the property to the enterprise.

Which means the seller has to pay that fee at closing to the alleged consultant and marketing company.

Is she allegedly providing services to you the Buyer?

If the property was in fact held in a land trust, then the land trust company will certainly file criminal complaints against the alleged con man.So the original poster can ask the nut job applicant for the criminal complaints.As for the "legal team" -- talk to them and obtain case numbers for filed complaints (most county court systems areset up for on line case name searches, so one can type in her name and see if any cases are filed in her name), and any filed charges with state agencies that the "legal team" made.And if it turns out that nut job applicant lied about any part of the story, disqualify her immediately and forevermore, documenting everything and saving your records.

You could imagine that's a little intimidating for my first deal :-)Alleged value of the 25 properties is $1,300,000Seller started his talking at $1,000,000. 100% occupancy and rents bring in $13k per month. 

You got into this with no money down and don't have the money to hire an attorney to fight the "false" allegations.

Ask price is $109,000, alleged to rent for $1,000 per month with a tenant in place.  

They allege service which was never actually made, don't do a skip-trace on all heirs of estates (there are often estates involved in tax-sales), don't run a bankruptcy check, or attempt to comply with California service/title/foreclosure guidelines rather than Georgia.  

One of seven penalties imposed by the U.K.’s Financial Conduct Authority, Lloyds faces a $218 MM fine for misconduct and alleged manipulation of LIBOR.

This means that, once again, a attempt to use disparate impact evidence to establish that a lender engaged in a “pattern or practice” of intentional discrimination will not be tested in court.The amended complaint alleged that there was a “statistically signi4icant” disparity between the way the seller 4inancier charged Asian and non-­?