Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Mobile Home Park Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 11 years ago,

User Stats

700
Posts
479
Votes
Ken Rishel#4 Mobile Home Park Investing Contributor
  • Specialist
  • Springfield, IL
479
Votes |
700
Posts

Small Seller Financier versus CFPB - DOJ

Ken Rishel#4 Mobile Home Park Investing Contributor
  • Specialist
  • Springfield, IL
Posted

The Feds recently settled a fair lending lawsuit against a seller 4inancier. This means that, once again, a attempt to use disparate impact evidence to establish that a lender engaged in a “pattern or practice” of intentional discrimination will not be tested in court.

The amended complaint alleged that there was a “statistically signi4icant” disparity between the way the seller 4inancier charged Asian and non-­?Asian borrowers. The contention was over the seller 4inancier’s practice of giving its employees “discretion to engage in subjective decision-­?making and setting interest rates within broad parameters.” According to the complaint, the employees’ discretion “was exercised in a manner that discriminated against non-­?Asian borrowers.”

In the complaint, the DOJ asserted various theories for its claim that the seller 4inancier had discriminated against borrowers on the basis of race or national origin, violating the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA). The complaint charged that the seller 4inancier “engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination on the basis of race or national origin.” It also charged that “the discriminatory policies and practices, “were intentional, willful, and were implemented with reckless disregard for the rights of non-­?Asian and Hispanic customers.”

The seller 4inancier agreed to a $125,000 4ine and to exit the 4inance business. They further agreed that if any of the principals reentered the business of lending that they would presubmit a written lending policy and procedure manual for government approval before making any loans as well as an automatic annual review of their lending operation, and lending compliance training for owners, of4icers, employees, and agents of the new lending entity. In March, the CFPB announced their intent to focus of seller 4inance operations and this is just the 4irst of many cases the CFPB has referred to the FBI and DOJ attorneys. Many more are coming.

From the September issue of the Chattel Finance Newsletter - reprinted by permission

Loading replies...