So which of these options sounds workable:1 - Lend on the land / and or house.

Thus, I'm asking for input towards any major oversights, and if this plan is workable.

We find them ourselves, peek in the windows, crawl under the house and then can call the listing agent to look more if looks workable.

But this is probably your best bet for creating a workable list.

Then I make two payments, one to buy the house (at a price less than what I can sell mine for, thus preserving my Prop 60 advantage) and a second payment to cover the rehab and profit of the flipper.Does this seem like a workable idea or is it flawed.

I did not want to make it easy for the Banking division to sapeana the servicer for the lender names, which I heard happened.In our opinion, this is no longer a workable solution despite the fact that we were teaching both the MLOs/Brokers how to do this legally (most of them were not doing it legally) as little as a year ago to help small operators FWIW I called around in Atlanta/GA and only found 1, that's it, just one loan originator who'd do an owner financed deal.

If that 48% revolving credit utilization due to my student loans is workable w/ a loan, what might I have to do to get that mortgage?

I enjoy creating workable and utilitarian spaces from neglected spaces.

So at 60% they are still workable.

I'm not familiar with their workability, validity with IRS, etc.Does anyone use or know about these?