data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f6c9/7f6c9e21e07dd8fd35c7c3d9a660ea784770dabc" alt=""
26 February 2025 | 5 replies
Location is the one thing you can’t change about a property and it’s one of the most important factors.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e1e/87e1e4f50d7ef000b4499eb88a4718ede4ec23e8" alt=""
25 February 2025 | 8 replies
I am located in Las Vegas.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0afcb/0afcb307e0f87326a3d9203724c849b908e6f558" alt=""
20 February 2025 | 1 reply
Purchase price: $390,000 Cash invested: $390,000 Brand new construction nestled in the Grovemont neighborhood and conveniently located just 15 min from downtown Asheville & 10 min from Black Mountain. 3BR, 2.5 Bath, front and back deck, nice natural light.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb35c/bb35c0834808fd1b36bdbe533f2c3a3f57dd04ea" alt=""
21 February 2025 | 12 replies
Where are you located?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be439/be439548d4307c81743a16deafb74ba83b5edbd0" alt=""
24 February 2025 | 26 replies
I'm guessing it's the winter and the location.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7942e/7942e0035ec138f3a6b96f247703879608266554" alt=""
20 February 2025 | 8 replies
Where are these 7 parks located?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87393/87393d571a4fb8c7d4019a9279bd2be78e748a4b" alt=""
6 February 2025 | 10 replies
Your location references Kansas City, Kansas, but your post seems to reference the KC metro area.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1483/e14839e7bda9715b8e2c0580dbee96b4f722c12a" alt=""
14 February 2025 | 15 replies
Not exactly the same area, but there are a lot of parallels to owning and managing in both locations.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8ad2/a8ad22710d225541758cd39682bb86bdef750c45" alt=""
12 February 2025 | 3 replies
I didn't see a location option for Ventura, County, CA, I hope that's not bad news.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/550f9/550f9c4fd06eb2736a73683bec33546a823d72f3" alt=""
20 February 2025 | 11 replies
With Risk Rating 2.0, FEMA looks at several factors to assess a property's real flood risk.Key Factors Considered- Property Location: How close the property is to water sources (rivers, lakes, coasts).- Flood Frequency: How often the area floods historically.- Types of Floods: Includes heavy rainfall, storm surges, and river overflow.- Elevation and Distance from Water: Higher and farther properties generally face lower risk.- Rebuilding Costs: Higher-value homes may have higher premiums due to more expensive repairs.What This Means for Homeowners- Fairer Premiums: Properties with lower risk may see lower premiums, while higher-risk properties may face increased costs.- Gradual Rate Increases: Increases are phased in over time for policyholders who see higher premiums, with annual caps on the rate hike.- More Predictable Rates: Rates better reflect the real risk rather than just being based on a flood zone map.Example Scenario (Simplified)- Old System: A house in a designated flood zone pays $1,000 annually, regardless of its elevation or distance from the water.- Risk Rating 2.0: That same house may now pay $1,200 if it's closer to the water and more vulnerable or $800 if it's higher up and better protected.Flood zones still matter under Risk Rating 2.0, but their role has changed.