Since no sale or unauthorized transfer has taken place, there is no compromise of, or threat by, the lender’s skulking little due-on-sale clause: i.e., 1) the borrower has transferred his property to an authorized inter vivos trust; 2) the borrower is, and shall remain, a beneficiary in the trust; 3) the trust is revocable; and 4) the trust itself does not relate to the granting of occupancy rights to anyone (that’s done by a separate lease agreement).

Any thought about extending it to the end of Cyber Monday?

It is not a threat to those of us that typically operate in a one-off strategy, whether homeowner or investor.The bottom line: the landscape is changing, but it always does.

This board is very sensitive to costs, so such a threat may have an effect.I have been president of a board, but I'm still a working guy and don't have the time now (it was a huge time suck).The Board is a virtual dictatorship.

I have friends that do Section 8; they say the threat of losing vouchers for life gets the money rolling in quick.

As john said, unless there is a threat of immediate death, I'm looking in the windows at minimum.

If I had reported it, at least he might be on the radar (since his threats were no addressed to anyone particularly, he would not be arrested).But I know the guy is not a stable type, far right and flys his colors, the stars and bars on his truck.

The item that is advanced must pose a threat to the advancing lien.  

I would love to learn from you and will be following your posts – you have a BP cyber stalker on your hands ;)@Thomas Blaine – awesome, congrats on your success!

After all the "threats" of showing to court because he would win, he did not even show up!