Getting court hearing dates are really taking longer time.

It’s true that not being able to drive can make things a bit more complex, but you can definitely find ways around it.Using rideshare or public transportation is a viable option, especially in areas with good transit systems.

The legitimacy of the contract probably only really matters if you have to go to court/arbitration to enforce it.That said, your title company would be a good place to start in terms of getting a legal review, I'm sure they have a real estate lawyer(s) on staff or retainer depending on the state.

That is also leverage in getting him to pay.If this isn't a huge issue, I would take him to small claims court.

Hey Jason, I know plenty of investors that pay anywhere from 1200 bucks a year to 5000 dollars per year, really depending on their situation and complexity.

Given the complexity and potential tax-saving opportunities in real estate, it's wise to consider hiring a CPA with expertise in this field.Many clients who work with non-specialists find that their non-real estate preparers lack the specific knowledge to help them minimize taxes through strategies like depreciation, the de minimis safe harbor, partial asset dispositions, 1031 exchanges, navigating real estate professional status, the short-term rental loophole, and more.If you are looking to qualify as a real estate professional, use the short-term rental strategy, or complete a 1031 exchange, I would without a doubt recommend working with a real estate CPA.

It’s a bit complex, so working with a 1031 exchange expert and a tax advisor is crucial to make sure everything is done correctly.

You served her with 3 day notice, now go file with the JP court for that area.You probably need to get the a/c fixed also.

I post frequently about the unnecessary complexities of most real estate investors asset protection structures and the point I normally emphasize is the lack of attention placed on the day to day operations that are far more critical to reducing liability exposure.

Based on the details from the clerk of courts, it appeared that the investor was attempting to hide assets and refusing to turn over documents, one of which was copies of all renovation agreements.