More of a nuisance than anything, but I thought I would share.

Another Tenant who called me about roaches, but when we arrived on scene, her unit looked like a diner after the lunch rush.....You get the idea.So, the idea of the Tenant paying the first $50 of any repair or trade call fee is to weed out all of the nuisance or negligent calls that tenants make. 

I'm pretty unfamiliar with the Receivership process, but from what I can gather here, it's the City's way of abating "nuisance" properties when the owners won't renovate them. 

I'd rather lose some money than deal with a nuisance tenant. 

Appraisers aren't necessarily up to speed on the nuisances of the industry and can mis-price the asset.

Too much wear and tear on the property, too much nuisance with noise and cars going through (drop off and pick up).Wait for someone else. 

So trying to collect the $15.00 nuisance fine would open up a whole can of worms.And a year ago, the city here introduced recycling food scraps, involving another can.

Last time I checked on this, there was some rumbling that the City may do something about it since it's becoming such a nuisance.

I work a 9-5 at a fortune 500 company, I can't risk "Public nuisance" on my record just for an investment. 

One way of identifying vacant properties is looking at homes that have been reported to the nuisance abatement office in your town/city/county.