Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Mobile Home Park Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 7 years ago, 03/23/2018

User Stats

61
Posts
31
Votes
Tyler Weinrich
  • Investor
  • Oklahoma City, OK
31
Votes |
61
Posts

Would you overpay on purchase price if cashflow is there?

Tyler Weinrich
  • Investor
  • Oklahoma City, OK
Posted

Looking at a park and owner is asking $130k over what it will probably appraise for but is willing to finance the whole purchase. This got me thinking, if you could get the owner to finance 100% (or even 95%) of the purchase price at a rate and terms that would safely cash flow after all expenses (maintenance, vacancy, utilities, management, etc.).....would you overpay for a park? Assuming already on city water/sewer, individually metered utilities. At some point you'll pay it down enough to see equity. Until then, the cash flow should support the asset. 

Loading replies...