data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f96b/8f96bcaa82c42802a612eb1a64f7f12e57d56bc0" alt=""
3 November 2016 | 3 replies
Mike Warder assuming price is substantially similar or the same, I'd give a second company a shot.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ccdad/ccdadae116f9f01bb600624cc42f8bf506b19503" alt=""
7 October 2016 | 12 replies
So I looked for second opinion but none of the contractors I spoke to were interested in taking a look without charging me up front about $350 dollars for the visit.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a8f5/4a8f5d465349fd777a189d4f3ebefd00abe2df7f" alt=""
3 October 2016 | 1 reply
A recent article in the Arizona Daily Star talks about the substantial investment potential and recent radical growth in neighborhoods near Downtown Tucson.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/820ee/820ee344ed19baae0bb3b7ceac2608f5cdb5d501" alt=""
25 October 2016 | 11 replies
Hmmm...Edit: yeah, I don't see adding substantially to the value. 40k would really be tops for this property in this area
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b4e5/4b4e5dfb20af8aaf16202f3bfe22a33fd62f4bd9" alt=""
4 October 2016 | 8 replies
well assuming it meets the QM rules for owner occ.. etc.the scenario you presented is not a very attractive note unless the discount was HUGEPV is what investor look at.... what rate of return they want and in notes its usually 8 to 12% APR but with 100% leverage most investors will only pay on face value about 60 to 70% LTV ... so right off the top you would be taking a substantial hair cut.No secret what your trying to do.. but I surmise you will very quickly realize its not realistic .. the discount would be such that it makes it a no go.If your thinking someone will lock up their money for 10 years at 5% well thats not going to happen especially at 100% LTV...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3832/e3832cf3bd199848f715310c799e07ab2f32bc93" alt=""
10 October 2016 | 1 reply
Anyways, I am curious if anyone would be interested in taking a Saturday morning and showing me what they look for in a property.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfca7/dfca70d756625d0a15bd0669e9a308b53e04d4f0" alt=""
6 October 2016 | 5 replies
Comp rents are around $1,100 and I think the seller may be interested in taking $110k-$120k.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5811/e58119ac12f26ae66343e3451bee4f65b221f846" alt=""
2 March 2019 | 22 replies
From my perspective ( I am no expert) prices have risen substantially over the past 7 years (as everywhere) and it is difficult to find properties that meet good cash flow criteria at the moment.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e531f/e531ff799aa7bb678fa2dbde260b38ee096d8c0f" alt=""
7 October 2016 | 3 replies
I'm looking for flips so if you have any I'd be interested in taking a look.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60f62/60f62e999812fd60d8c21c01022c72839d1395f2" alt=""
14 October 2016 | 11 replies
Just because the theoretical opening bid is the tax amount they usually sell substantially higher.