It'd also have very little chance of making it through the Senate as there are going to be a few Senators that will understand this will be bad for the housing market and/or those in swing states. 

Which is, 'yeah there's a small (or if you prefer NEGATIVE 100% ) chance of a 40% price reduction, but WHAT IF it does happen?

*Buy and provide a golf cart as an additional fee (which I view as you best chance prove the value and cash flow from the asset)*Do not buy a golf cart, but simply provide info to a local golf cart rental.

I suspect you do not want to go to 100% vacancy.If you are raising rents a small amount, that is less important.If you are putting them on a lease, make sure your lease-end dates are staggered so that you don't, by chance, end up at 100% vacancy.

Yes people lose it all, typically because of over leverage or crazy events like 2008 - but if you also have cash reserves you can offset any downside to minimize risk even moreWhen people start using lines of credit and seller financing at 90-100% you are correct those people have a very high chance of losing it all.

Better chance if you’re a big, profitable customer.Gotta ask the ATO what a file would require for them to be comfortable writing policy to pass title. 

We'd love to connect with NYC-based private lenders, but would appreciate the chance to talk with anyone on the lending side.

Because I don't want to give the owner a chance to reject them in a manner that may violate Fair Housing.Here's an example:"Hey, John.

Your questions are so basic you are at least a year out from constant learning to have a chance of success.

Both of these people have a 30-50% chance of blowing this situation, at least.