The flurry of legislation pushed through, often in proximity to statutory deadlines, required rapid digestion, analysis, and dissemination to clients. 

In addition to these potentially favorable factors, the state of California has improved J/ADU legislation to promote their development including allowing ADUs and JADUs to be built concurrently with a single-family dwelling, opening areas where ADUs can be created to include all zoning districts that allow single-family and multifamily uses, modifying fees from utilities such as special districts and water corporation and limited exemptions or reductions in impact fees.

Where in the legislation (all 55 pages of it) can one find this?

While I very respectfully disagree with @John Clark that Illinois itself is, as of today, anti-landlord -- it may trend that way (if some current state legislators have their way) and Chicago and Cook County currently are not particularly hospitable to landlords.

COVID has resulted in a lot of emergency legislation being passed which allows Remote Online Notarization.

If you want something with no risk or low risk buy a savings bond or open a money market account and sell the house to someone who can actually live in it. there is going to have to be major national legislation passed to stop this kind of nonsense.

The perception that landlords are all greedy is popular, and one that can lead to legislative changes.

You can read more about that here:https://a17.asmdc.org/issue/ab-1482-frequently-asked-questionshttps://cal-rha.org/legislative/ab-1482/Ultimately, if they refused to leave, the only way to legally remove them is through an eviction. 

They’re industry leaders when it comes tonavigating the constant legislative changes the city and the state pass.

This is sad to see as it appears your local governing body is submitting to State influenced legislation.