They may choose to not to finish foreclosure and wait for M(1) to foreclose and exerciser their right of redemption.When M(2) chooses to redeem, one of three things happen:(1) M(2) gains the rights equal to that of a third party buyer at auction, if no further redemption occur through expiration, then those rights turn into title.(2) M(2) simply causes the foreclosure judgement to be avoided.

For me, it makes more sense to base judgements off income, credit, criminal history, judgements, etc.

The "typical" process requires non-payment followed by eviction and a monetary judgement.

Not a big deal unless you have to evict/get a judgement, in which case those things could be useful.I've been using them for about 4 years.

The financial condition of the HOAAre there any judgement against the sellers?

Don't let one sensational story cloud your judgement. :)

I'm not sure of all of the particulars of the case, but the judgement cost him $18k.

One argument is that the BK code is not for declaratory judgement of this nature.

Title company mentioned there is a judgement on it for $9,5000.So I am just wondering if there are some recommendations on How do I negotiate or eliminate the judgement?

But then I would bring up the SCRA requirements not being met.This is partly a judgement call and partly understanding what the real story is.