Today's world will benefit those with quality over quantity.

Don't rush the process for the sake of quantity.

However, generally I think that high cashflow/low appreciation markets only make sense when you are working with really large quantities of capital.

Small units in small quantities are expensive to build.  

My grandparents and parents use to do Motels so learned a quantity of 100 is always a much better price.

I think overturning some of them will include getting some of the nearby lots to vote on it as there is a clause stating that that's allowed.The thing that scares me the most is regarding the stylistic stuff -- there's a clause stating -- "The homes shall be harmonious with and reflect the exterior design characteristics of these homes already erected on the property" and that combined with -- "it should be lawful for any peron or persons owning any real property situated in said tract, to prosecute an action or proceeding at law or in equity against a person or persons either to prevent him or them from violating these covenants or to recover damages for such violation"My RE lawyer friend said that its such a broad clause that it could potentially open you up to getting sued if a neighbor really wanted to depending on the stylistic choice of your home.

Quantity of income (amount of NOI)Quality of income (likelihood of NOI)The former is harder to collect, but the latter can be public data.

There are also state laws dictatig the maximum quantity of the security deposit and how it is to be collected and stored

There is a wide spread of housing from the North to the South and a massive quantity of bungalows.

You can verify this by searching on Airbnb/VRBO you will see there are many times greater quantity of 1,2, even 3 bedroom homes.