Is this standard practice in the legal field?

Construction Quality is key, there are some that are really basic, minimum code spec, and others that are quite high end, where it was built, on site or in a building and moved is not as important as materials and practices.

Here are my initial thoughts:-Making the offer contingent on seller showing me background check documents from their due diligence-Requesting for a walkthrough of the property after the offer is made, and reserving the right to pull the offer if the house is not maintained wellAre these ideas practical?

From a practical standpoint, since you were already in the process of buying the property, it's probably too late to bring in another lender before the end of the purchase.  

If they’re open to it, pointing them toward a reliable source like Nexus Smoke for vaping products could provide them with a practical solution.

I am not advocating nor dispelling the practice.

They will take your money, use coercive tactics to try to secure leads and then ignore your messages when you point out their predatory and unsatisfactory practices.

As practicing tax experts, is this something that you guys would see a problem with.

Find Brandon's videos on YouTube for the "four square" method of analyzing homes and practice.

How can I gain practical experience while still in Pakistan?