Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

48
Posts
10
Votes
Doug Davis
10
Votes |
48
Posts

Subject To - Equity and Seller motivation

Doug Davis
Posted

I've been watching YouTube videos, reading, listening to podcasts.   A couple of investors said that it was important that homeowners had a certain amount of equity before they make an offer using the subject to finance method.  I didn't really understand why as long as the loan was not underwater and they didn't explain it.  Why would equity be important when acquiring a house via subject-to?

Also, if I am a homeowner, I can't think of the benefit of selling "sub to".  I would think that the bank is still going to hold me responsible for the mortgage and that the mortgage would still count against my debt to income ratio, making it more difficult to get another house.  Is there any advantage to selling  sub to?  Or is it just that people want to get rid of the house so bad they take whatever option is available.

Loading replies...