@Leticia Ramos if this were me, I would only proceed if we had specified in our lease with them that this was an eventuality and that they had agreed to it by signing the lease.If your lease is silent on this, then I would wait until lease renewal time and make those conditions part of the new lease.

I have an opportunity that would eventually become our primary residence.

A friend's sister-in-law was renting an apartment once where it was eventually discovered that a person was in fact living in the attic.

We both work full time but would love to eventually get into flipping full time.

Aside from offering this as a benefit to outstanding tenant prospects.So, you think a GOOD tenant will break a lease and accept a judgement against them that may follow them as a lien, gaining interest all along, and nixing their hopes of buying a home for years unless eventually paid off?

I eventually sell at $23k just to get rid of it.

Title companies ignoring this policy will eventually (after default, claim and investigation) get black-balled from closing federally insured loans… regardless of whether or not they are aware of it.

This is why NAR will fight it and NAR will win, eventually.

The bad mark on the debtor's credit is sometimes enough to encourage a person to eventually make good on their debt.

Quote from @Bocondo Williams: That's the problem with free software: they eventually have to generate revenue, then they want to produce profit, then they want bigger profit.I think most software is going to charge $1 or more for every ACH payment.