They have zero duty to you and will likely give you bad advice, even if it's not with malicious intent.

That's why I'm generally pretty lenient, but like I said I have to draw the line at what I consider intentional (and even malicious) damage such as I found in this home.

In any case current investigations are not likely affected either way by this ongoing discussion - so our "decision" to act or not act is probably pointless.

He wants to be an actor, but sings and plays, too.

Apr. 29, 1999) (considering housing management corporation to be state actor for Privacy Act purposes but finding that Privacy Act does not apply to income verification process for public housing program because of exception created by 42 U.S.C. § 405(c)(2)(C)(i))."

If you start a fight over it, you risk them being careless or malicious with the unit.

I observe, I ask questions, and I am likely to catch them in the act or catch them in a lie.

With open houses, you have a natural deterrent to bad actors because there are likely to be more people around.

Have a previous bad actor tenant commit a sexual assault and be sued for ten million?

A while back I did hear about a firm voluntarily doing blind phone call tests to ensure equal housing laws (spirit and letter) were being followed, and found that actors playing identical characters with a stereotypically white v black sounding names had things explained to them at vastly different levels of detail, with actors playing characters with 'white' names being given more tips, more detail, more options, on average, during that initial no paperwork phone call with the MLOs.