IMHO they are both good areas for this endeavor...just curious what the rationale is.Best wishes!

How we are attempting to gain more confidence in our offers right now, is a little more conservative numbers in the analysis phase.

Hello BiggerPockets Community,I hope you're all thriving in your real estate endeavors!

.- Is attempting to get 100 subject-to deals, but is not even capitalized to pay off or inject enough equity to refinance a single one of the acquired deals to have it qualify for refinance, much less a few dozen of them. 

The sale of the single-family should easily cover what we'll need for the cash injection and about thirty thousand left over for a war chest to fix whatever comes up with the new acquisition.We are confident in our plans and our skills and the rest of our team in this new endeavor, we have a good handle on what needs to be done, and really, while this will be a major move for us, it won't overextend our resources.

He is also amazing at never following up, never reaching out or providing updates, and stellar at avoiding all communication attempts from the customer.

@Jeff S.I just started to attempt this now so we'll see how it goes...

Most Mortgage Banks have the ability to broker some loans and attempt to call themselves Brokers now as consumers are getting smarter and starting to realize in most situations Brokers have better rates.

Banks rarely heed attempts to beg for forgiveness

Account Closed is correct, absolutely do both.. especially if youre just starting out even Grant Cardone started with a SFR. but for the sake of his question lets say you have 100k saved up for a real estate endeavor TOTAL, and you find a SFR that fits the 1% ratio (100k house that brings in 1k rent) that is doable if you calculate it out that would equal a 8.2% cash on cash IF it stays at a 90% occupancy rate. on the other hand if you invest that 100k into a limited partnership with a company that invests in value add apartments will now your cash on cash can be a preferred 10% with a target of 16-20% IRR which would essentially double your money in 2-5 years.. in this scenario the SFR would take sweat equity from you and risk while only returning a measly 8% CoC while the MF would be completely passive allowing you to learn and grow without hindrance with a 10% CoCnow we are over simplifying but I hope this made sense.. cuz my brain hurts ;D