Essentially you’re taking a gamble new tenants can and will pay beyond move in cost.

Yes, I am kidding.I might have my stories mixed up but I heard the CEO of AirBNB or some new company saved his tanking business by gambling their last couple thousand and winning big.

I enjoyed it: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOe_y6KKvS3PdIfb9q9pGugI've seen people step up from across the world, whether they're businesses retrofitting to landlords helping their tenants.I'm really impressed with the Dyson vacuum guy designing a ventilator in 10 days; he'll be producing them for the UK and I assume for whomever else wants to order.Here's a link to some wealthy people and how they've helped; it's inspiring and although we can't affect to that magnitude we can always think of ways to help others even if it's on a small scale for if enough of us do it it will add up to make a big difference for many: https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/348372

The issue goes both ways and it truly is a gamble--parties post foreclosure generally don't have good credit to redeem--BUT the former fee title owner with only redemption rights sells their redemption rights to a purchaser/third party which redeems and becomes the fee title owner. 

Don’t gamble on the neighborhood5. 

I watched a UK documentary on something like that a few years ago.

Don’t get me wrong, a lot of people win and do well playing the appreciation game but it is my opinion that we are at or near the top of the market so I personally wouldn’t gamble on continued appreciation for the win.

In today market going for the KILLER DEAL is a gamble.

And the other half are appalled and outraged that the thought would even occur as it is the height off moral inequity.Just wait until this later group finds out there is gambling in Casablanca

I feel like that is a large gamble in itself.