This is a good deed for which you would be severely punished.

What Judge in their right mind would punish you for rejecting a person who has a negative legal history with landlords?

However, the same clause prevents a defaulting party from maliciously and unlawfully detaining the property under the guise of having an “equitable interest (‘claim of equity’)” in it in order to forestall eviction, buy time and free rent.

However for the people who are really good at real estate investing, they are the enemy and must be punished for their success.

It is punishable by a fine not to exceed $250,000 and/or a prison sentence of not more than two years."

I think you're running into this with SmartMove because it is part of one of the credit bureaus - so credit checking is probably required.The one thing you will lose by skipping credit checking is their address history; I use that to confirm data regarding residency, landlord history, eviction history ...If you know that they have always been residents in Minnesota, then you can use google to find free public criminal search:https://cch.state.mn.us/http://www.doc.state.mn.us/search/default.htmhttp://www.mncriminals.com/https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/Pages/criminal-history.aspxhttps://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/pages/background-checks.aspxEviction (unlawful detainer in MN) is another matter.

We need to stop focusing on any type of gun ban and start focusing on punishing criminals.

Their biggest mistake in my opinion, was wasting time by not filing an unlawful detainer immediately.

These people filled a demurrer to my unlawful detainer.

It's not about whether or not the SEC finds out about an unlawful security offering before the syndication.