That way, you can objectively weigh the risk-reward tradeoff of the various options available to you. 

I have come to believe that in order for each party to meet their respective objectives both sides must meet in the "reasonable" middle.

They were meaningful to me as objects - I spent a lot of my young boy days assembling the collection of Mantles, Mays, Clementes, and the like - and they've experienced massive appreciation, which is nice.

I'm getting shiny object syndrome again.....urgh.

It may violate all sales rules, but I tell new investors fairly regularly not to invest when I feel their objectives are misaligned with the fund we are offering.

Only only one tenant objected and they had a good rental history so I continued to rent to them.

However, it is important for investors to consider their own risk tolerances and investment objectives and not just focus on tax benefits. 

@Thomas S.Great advice - thxSo if I took out a large amount as protection, the hope is that there will be an HOA decision during the process in whicn he objects to the withheld funds.

You personally not liking something isn't the same as objective constructive criticism.

If I come across a deal that meets my objectives tomorrow, or next week-I'm buying!