1031 Exchanges
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7074e/7074ebd9d9ae7976e202efc43556b5438aae52fd" alt="Melinda Pajak's profile image"
In San Diego- sell 5 unit place and 1031 into larger rental?
I'm new here --we bought a 5 unit rental property in Hillcrest (San Diego, CA) for $411k in 1999. It has a positive cash flow now as we've remodeled and raised rents over the years. I manage the property and we live nearby. This is our only real estate investment property besides owning our house. It has come to a point where we need to spend maybe $100k or more to fix up the two standalone cottages at the back of the property. We are having trouble deciding whether it makes sense to try to buy an 8 or 10 unit place on a 1031 exchange here in San Diego or just keep the buy and hold strategy on this one and undertake the remodeling project. Any thoughts?
We own the property outright but have a large mortgage on our own house (we combined both mortgages a few years back when interest rates were low but it will take us another 20 years to pay it off). Our son will be going off to college in a few years so positive cash flow would be beneficial.
I read on some other discussions here that positive cash flow in San Diego is a dream on any new properties so does our current strategy of buying and holding still make sense here? Any thoughts are appreciated.
Thanks,
Melinda Pajak
Landlord/Owner
San Diego CA
Most Popular Reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/990e0/990e048d4c69fdc973c60389c418063b4e6da7d0" alt="Dan H.'s profile image"
- Investor
- Poway, CA
- 6,987
- Votes |
- 6,053
- Posts
Your RE has experienced significant appreciation that, due to prop 13, you are not paying property taxes at its current value. This needs to be taken into consideration for any CA property that has experienced significant appreciation.
My own opinion, versus the above is simple fact, is that I would keep the RE but use more leverage than you are currently using. If my equity position is 20% and the property appreciates 10%, I have made 50% on my equity from the appreciation. However, if I have a 100% equity position and the property appreciates 10%, I have made 10% on my equity from the appreciation. I would keep the property and keep my prop 13 protected property tax saving and leverage its equity for the necessary improvements as a minimum. I would likely leverage to a 75% LTV and diversify into either another RE or another investment option.
I would be hesitant to sell a multiplex in a market with the historical ROI of San Diego that has significant prop 13 property tax advantages. For what better investment? San Diego historical ROI is near the top in the nation for this century and both locations that are above it have rent control and San Diego does not. Do you think those locations are likely to stay ahead of San Diego? Source: Core Logic.
Good luck