Size of the Units - larger units generally equals more tenants equals higher usage.

I would argue market and submarket dynamics are far riskier than property class, i.e. a C property from amenities standpoint in an A area will, all else being equal, out perform an A asset in C market.Was the property that you invested in that lost money marketed as a C property?  

There's no cash flow that equals that. 

So I will qualify the following with the statement that this represents MY personal “moral” or ethical position, and others may have legitimate differences.First, I ask if I’m dealing on the other side with “equal” , i.e.  

To make my point, if you own a property and have an amazing 2% interest rate but only cash flow $100 per month but can buy 4 units and cash flow $400 per month but have a terrible 10% interest rate all things equal would you not do it?

If it were a dog of a property and still penciled like this, I would be equally emotional.

I think between the last option and this one, most folks would pay the 1% + 0.25% for the lack of PPP.Commercial Mortgage Backed Security: Net worth must be equal to the loan amount, and liquidity must be 10% of the loan amount, absentee borrower is fine/normal here. 

Abroad, the challenge is equally glaring.

All things being equal, the party that submitted first should theoretically have priority? 

Because all else being equal, if you are assessing two very similar deals in similar markets from similarly capable operators, the returns will be pretty similar at the end of the day.