After swallowing some lumps thanks to one thread I posted back in April, I should (crossed fingers, no blown furnaces or sheard off roofs) be in a good position next year to reinvest.This is hopefully not a beat the dead horse, "where is the best cash flow in X" post, more of a strategy question for anyone who knows the market in CT.Here is what my limited knowledge/intuition tells me: Waterbury, Bridgeport, parts of Hartford cash flow best because of the inherent risk, lower fairfield county cash flows worst (today) because of NYC effect on price/rent, and there is an in-between SOMEWHERE.I think that somewhere is in the central part of the state between route 8 and 91 north of new haven, east of waterbury.

These are good area that are going to cashflow positive and give you the appreciation and right tenant pool.Turnkey properties are popular in Old North, Merion Village, Southern Orchards, Old Towne East, Driving Park, North Linden, North Hilltop, Franklinton, Reynoldsburg, and Hungarian Village.

Just 10 years ago you would never see a stucco home in the metroplex.I have some friends that do higher end homes in the North Dallas area.

I actually grew up pretty close to Hartford and all my family still lives there but I am house hacking north of Boston and will likely stay here permanently.

Welcome Mike.I've been investing in the North Ogden area.

Yishi Zuo, I understand your desire for collateral. The first prototype will have all specified fixtures, finishes and products as My wife and I like and approve. That is for, if necessary for us to sell our existing ...

Im looking to connect with other STR owners across the North GA mountains.

I live just north of Boston and own two duplexes.

@Teekap Pate there is a very slim chance you will find something on the far north or far south side of Chicago on the lake front at that price point and even less likely chance you will find one that works with the HOA dues.In my opinion, you'd be better off looking for condos in those areas that need renovation - flipping.

I agree Don and in my earlier days in Northern CA brokerage activity it was common for listing agent to take less than selling agent.. when I moved North to OR WA it was the opposite listing agent would take a larger cut and they would justify it saying they did that because they had to pay for advertising and marketing etc..