I don't have time to live in the fine print, so if you throw fine print at me in some attempt to slip something past me- or you do the same to others; if you do wrong and justify and rationalize it rather than admit it, and repair the damage- you're out. to name just a few things...

I think they are two separate things and it is completely rational for the tax code to treat them differently.

You have some good points as well and my persistency ration was over 97%, top 5% in the nation.

Careful there partner...that is bordering on rational thinking.

Other countries rationally allow for choice in education and have better primary systems than ours.

Even if you are qualified credit-wise, your main culprit will be your DTI (Debt to income) ration.

As a Sociology major, however, the reasoning is actually quite sound:In a capitalistic society, the most rational players are those that receive a benefit with no cost expenditures.

Also, someone that has been in a property for over two decades and is willing to sell at this steep a discount should pose a flag.There are very few reasons why any rational person would undersell their most valuable asset at such a dip in the market?

It taints the site experience for those that would like to engage in rational debate.

He is well beyond the borders of rational, scientific discussion.